2020.07.10;五Jul10th:The US Cannot Withdraw from the WHO Without First Paying Its Dues - Just Security
Published by DB,
The US Cannot Withdraw from the WHO Without First Paying Its Dues
by Jean Galbraith
May 26, 2020
by Jean Galbraith
In a letter tweeted out on May 18, President Donald Trump mentioned his suspension of U.S. contributions to the World Health Organization (WHO). The letter also stated that
if the World Health Organization does not commit to major substantive improvements within the next 30 days, I will make my temporary freeze of United States funding to the World Health Organization permanent and reconsider our membership in the organization.
As a matter of policy, this is beyond foolish. As a matter of law, it raises several significant issues. Others have focused on whether Trump has the legal authority to suspend contributions. I want to focus here on Trump’s ability to withdraw the United States from the WHO – and on how this ability would be inhibited by a funding freeze.
The answer takes us back to the late 1940s. In 1948, the House and the Senate passed a joint resolution authorizing U.S. membership in the recently formed WHO. Because the WHO Constitution lacked a withdrawal provision, the joint resolution passed by Congress included a specific provision regarding exit:
In adopting this joint resolution, the Congress does so with the understanding that, in the absence of any provision in the World Health Organization Constitution for withdrawal from the Organization, the United States reserves its right to withdraw from the Organization on a one-year notice: Provided, however, That the financial obligations of the United States to the Organization shall be met in full for the Organization’s current fiscal year. (62 Stat. 441, 442 (1948).)
This provision originated in the Senate. The chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Arthur Vandenberg, proposed it in a hearing:
I submit to the committee the idea that we reserve to ourselves the right to withdraw on ninety days’ notice whenever we consider that the national interest requires, with the understanding, expressed in the same reservation that withdrawal, the act of withdrawal, includes an obligation to pay our assessments for whatever current year in which we withdraw, so that we do not abruptly upset their financial arrangements. (Hearing of July 1, 1947.)
While Vandenberg had proposed a 90-day notice period, later negotiations with the House led to the notice period being lengthened to one year.
The U.S. incorporated the joint resolution into its instrument of acceptance to the WHO Constitution. President Truman noted specifically in his statement of acceptance that he was "acting pursuant to the authority granted by the joint resolution … and subject to the provisions of that joint resolution." (62 Stat. 2792 (1948).)
A few weeks after the U.S. deposited its instrument of acceptance, on July 2, 1948, the World Health Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution that "recognized the validity of the ratification by the United States of America."
At the time the U.S. joined the WHO, customary international law was unsettled with respect to the conditions under which a nation could withdraw from a treaty that did not contain a withdrawal clause. Through its understanding – and the acceptance of this understanding by the state parties of the WHO – the U.S. ensured to itself a right of withdrawal as a matter of international law. This right appears conditioned, however, on both the giving of one year of notice and the full satisfaction of financial dues for the current fiscal year. While much of the U.S. funding for the WHO comes as voluntary contributions, the U.S. owes close to $60 million for the current year (and still has a balance outstanding from prior years).
As a matter of U.S. domestic law, it is an open question whether the president can unilaterally withdraw the U.S. from the WHO or whether congressional approval is needed for withdrawal. Because the U.S. joined the WHO via a joint resolution rather than through the mechanism set out in the Constitution’s Treaty Clause, it is what is sometimes termed an ex post congressional-executive agreement. Presidents have withdrawn the U.S. from such agreements on a few prior occasions. President Ronald Reagan withdrew the U.S. from UNESCO; President George W. Bush rejoined the United States to UNESCO (without intervening action by Congress); and Trump then re-withdrew the U.S. from UNESCO. But there is no judicial precedent on whether such unilateral withdrawal is indeed permissible, and the president’s power to do so is contested.
Congress’ joint resolution with respect to the WHO did not specify whether congressional approval would be needed for withdrawal as a matter of domestic law. But it did make clear that withdrawal should be "on a one-year notice" and that U.S. financial contributions "shall" be fully satisfied prior to withdrawal. To withdraw in any other manner would therefore be "incompatible with the … will of Congress."
Thus, at a minimum, Trump must choose between freezing U.S. assessed contributions and following through on his threat of withdrawal. He cannot do both.
Image: The logo of the World Health Organization (WHO) at the entrance of their headquarters in Geneva, amid the COVID-19 outbreak. Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images
Featured Articles
Pardoning Roger Stone Could Itself Be an Unpardonable Crime
by Sam Berger
Under Cover of COVID at the UN: Why Counterterrorism Is Not the Answer to a Pandemic
Supreme Court on Trump’s Finances: Glass Three Quarters Full for Rule of Law
by Norman L. Eisen and Victoria Bassetti
Colombian Peace Efforts on Life Support Amid the COVID-19 Response
UN’s "Counter-Terrorism Week" Misses the Mark in Marginalizing Civil Society
Trump Pushed CIA to Give Intelligence to Kremlin, While Taking No Action Against Russia Arming Taliban
by Ryan Goodman
Mexico’s Priorities as an Elected Member to the Security Council for 2021-2022
Unpacking the National Intelligence Council’s Memo on Russian Bounty Operation
by Nicholas Rasmussen and Ryan Goodman
Patriotism and Justice on an Unusual Independence Day
The Baseline: How a Functional Executive Would Have Handled the Russian Bounty Operation
The CIA’s Long and Winding Road to Diversity
Welcoming E. Tendayi Achiume, Barbara McQuade, and Matiangai Sirleaf to Just Security’s Board of Editors
by Tess Bridgeman and Ryan Goodman
Transitional Justice, Race, and the United States
First They Came For Me and My Colleagues: The U.S. Attack on the Int’l Criminal Court
by Leila Sadat
I help children in armed conflict. The President is forcing me to stop.
A Solution in Search of a Problem: The Dangerous Invalidity of Divesting Military Commanders of Disposition Authority for Military Criminal Offenses
A Rejoinder to China’s Response to UN Human Rights Experts
by David Kaye
11 Top Antitrust Experts Alarmed by Whistleblower Complaint Against A.G. Barr—and Office of Professional Responsibility’s Opinion
by Ryan Goodman
Trump’s Rationale for Attacking the ICC—Continuity with Bush and Obama’s War on Terrorism
The Deeply Concerning, Misguided D.C. Circuit Mandamus Ruling in the Flynn Case
The United Nations Charter at 75: Between Force and Self-Defense — Part Two
The United Nations Charter at 75: Between Force and Self-Defense — Part One
Specific Questions for Congress (and News Media) to Ask Attorney General Barr
Just Security’s New Co-Editor-in-Chief
The Supreme Court’s Ominous DACA Decision: Perils for Dreamers in What Comes Next
by Adam Cox and Cristina Rodríguez
Bolton Book Confirms Most Serious Allegations in Trump Impeachment on Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
by Ryan Goodman
How Inter-State Procedures in Human Rights Treaties Can Support the Black Lives Matter Movement
Statement of Homeland and National Security Leaders
Dissecting the Executive Order on Int’l Criminal Court Sanctions: Scope, Effectiveness, and Tradeoffs
The Strength of America’s Apolitical Military
The Supreme Court’s Insidious Development of Qualified Immunity
by Nimra Azmi
At Confederate-Named Army Bases, Highlight US Ideals By Renaming Them for Honorable Figures
by Bishop Garrison and Benjamin Haas
The Untold Power of Bill Barr to Direct US Military Forces in Case of "Civil Unrest"
by Ryan Goodman and Steve Vladeck
Standing, Not-Standing with the Protesters: U.S. Policy on Hong Kong and BLM
The United States’ Racial Justice Problem Is Also an International Human Rights Law Problem
If We Could See Ourselves from the Outside
Invoking "Terrorism" Against Police Protestors
The President and the Domestic Deployment of the Military: Answers to Five Key Questions
by Mark Nevitt
A Bipartisan Push in Congress to Fight the ‘Parallel Pandemic’ of Human Rights Abuses Abroad
by Rob Berschinski and Reece Pelley
White Supremacist Infiltration of US Police Forces: Fact-Checking National Security Advisor O’Brien
Far-Right Infiltrators and Agitators in George Floyd Protests: Indicators of White Supremacists
by Mia Bloom
Trump’s Empty "Withdrawal" from the World Health Organization
Understanding the Michael Flynn Case: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff, and the Proper from the Improper
Jurisdiction at Guantanamo: The Case of Long-Term Complicity
Eli Lake’s Omissions and Misleading Facts in Defense of Michael Flynn
Nuclear Arms Control, or a New Arms Race? Trump Seems Bent on the Latter.
Advancing Rights and Justice During a Pandemic: An Online Event Series
by Sarah Knuckey and Jayne Huckerby
Tents at Sea: How Greek Officials Use Rescue Equipment for Illegal Deportations
by Niamh Keady-Tabbal and Itamar Mann
A Conversation With U.N. Special Rapporteur David Kaye: COVID-19 and Freedom of Expression
by David Kaye
Oxford Statement on the International Law Protections Against Cyber Operations Targeting the Health Care Sector
Turkey Opened the Door to the European Court of Human Rights for Syrian Victims
The Significance of the Supreme Court’s Opati Decision for States and Companies Sued for Terrorism in U.S. Courts
Anticipating Phase Two of the Trumped Up "Obamagate"
by Ryan Goodman
The Trump Administration’s Indefensible Legal Defense of Its Asylum Ban
Oversight and "Undermining": Reflections on the Supreme Court Oral Arguments About Subpoenas for Trump’s Financial Information
What the Pandemic Tells Us About the State of U.S. Cybersecurity
by Mark Montgomery and Robert Morgus
The Importance of New Statements on Sovereignty in Cyberspace by Austria, the Czech Republic and United States
Timeline of the Coronavirus Pandemic and U.S. Response
by Ryan Goodman and Danielle Schulkin
The Republic of Facebook
by David Kaye
The Perils of Hyping Pandemic Response as a National Security Issue
by Robert Malley and Stephen Pomper
Trump’s COVID-19 Immigration Proclamation May Be Legal, But It’s Still an Abuse of Power
by Adam Cox and Cristina Rodríguez
Top Experts Analyze Inspector General Report Finding Problems in FBI Surveillance
Why We Filed a FOIA Request on How Many US Troops Are in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria
by Kate Brannen and Ryan Goodman
Assessing Emergency Powers During #COVID-19
What Counts As Sufficient Transparency on Civilian Casualties in Somalia
by Luke Hartig
There is No Public Health Rationale for a Categorical Ban on Asylum Seekers
Seek and Speak the Truth
by Alex Joel
WhatsApp v. NSO Group: State Immunity and Cyber Spying
by Russell Buchan and Daniel Franchini
Pompeo’s "Rights Commission" Is Worse Than Feared: 7 Concerns to Watch
by Jayne Huckerby and Sarah Knuckey
Deepfakes 2.0: The New Era of "Truth Decay"
Coronavirus Border Expulsions: CDC’s Assault on Asylum Seekers and Unaccompanied Minors
The Time has Come to Have a Conversation at the U.N. on Self-Defence
Lawsuit Against Fox News Over Coronavirus Coverage: Can It Succeed? Should It?
by Erin Carroll
Don’t Bother Suing China for Coronavirus
COVID-19 Shows How the U.S. Got National Security Wrong
Biopharma: The Next National Security Frontier
A Chance to Fix FISA
Former Officials Challenge Pompeo’s Threats to the International Criminal Court
by Todd Buchwald, David Michael Crane, Benjamin Ferencz, Stephen J. Rapp, Ambassador David Scheffer and Clint Williamson
The Soleimani Strike and the Case for War Powers Reform
The Defense Department’s Measured Take on International Law in Cyberspace
Is the Pardon Power Unlimited?
by Harold Hongju Koh, Rosa Hayes, Dana Khabbaz, Michael Loughlin, Nicole Ng, Ayoub Ouederni and Brandon Willmore
Norm-Skepticism in Cyberspace? Counter-Factual and Counterproductive
The President’s War on Intelligence: Yes, It’s Worse Than You Think
New Online Resource: War Powers and Presidential Practice
by Tess Bridgeman and Rachel Goldbrenner
For House, Senate National Security Committees, Stopgaps for Term Limits
When Professionalism Mattered: Dissent Against U.S. Policy on Landmines
The Soul of the Justice Department: Who Must Stand Up For It Now
by Lisa Monaco
Punching on the Edges of the Grey Zone: Iranian Cyber Threats and State Cyber Responses
Please Support Just Security with a Tax-Deductible Donation
The CIA in the Age of Trump
Confronting Russia’s Role in Transnational White Supremacist Extremism
Reading Between the Votes: 53 Senators Say Trump Guilty on the Facts
by Ryan Goodman
Sudan’s Push for Removal from U.S. Terror List: Not a Panacea
by Hilary Mossberg and John Prendergast
International Criminal Court and the Question of Palestine’s Statehood: Part II
Compilation of States’ Reactions to U.S. and Iranian Uses of Force in Iraq in January 2020
How to Think About the Soleimani Strike in Four Questions
Iran’s Leaders Preserve the Republic With a Hybrid of International and Islamic Law
The President, His Relationship with Intelligence, and the Soleimani Strike
The Need for Increased Amicus Role in the FISA Process
U.S. Legal Defense of the Soleimani Strike at the United Nations: A Critical Assessment
Reevaluating Our Counter-Terrorism Information Sharing Methods
Lawful Self-Defense vs. Revenge Strikes: Scrutinizing Iran and U.S. Uses of Force under International Law
The Targeted Killing of General Soleimani: Its Lawfulness and Why It Matters
Iran’s Unlawful Reprisal (and Ours)
Soleimani Strike Marks a Novel Shift in Targeted Killing, Dangerous to the Global Order
United States Killed Iraqi Military Official and Iraqi Military Personnel in the Two Recent Attacks
Top Experts’ Backgrounder: Military Action Against Iran and US Domestic Law
by Brian Egan and Tess Bridgeman
The Crossfire Hurricane Report’s Inconvenient Findings
New Leaked Documents Reveal China’s Chilling Crackdown on Muslims
Duty to Warn: Has the Trump Administration Learned from the Khashoggi Failure?
Can Turkey be Expelled from NATO? It’s Legally Possible, Whether or Not Politically Prudent
by Aurel Sari
Climate Change Denialism Poses a National Security Threat
by Mark Nevitt
What’s the New Terror Financing Executive Order All About?
Guidelines on Investigating Violations of International Humanitarian Law
Expert Summaries of Mueller Report: A Collection
by Just Security, Kate Brannen, George T. Conway III, Jennifer Daskal, Kristen Eichensehr, Joshua Geltzer, Ryan Goodman, Elie Honig, Harry Litman, Renato Mariotti, Barbara McQuade, Asha Rangappa, Mimi Rocah, Paul Seamus Ryan, Rita Siemion, Joyce Vance and Andy Wright
Army and Marine Corps Publish New Manual: The Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Land Warfare
Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on "Collusion"
by Ryan Goodman
Transparency on Civilian Harm in Somalia Matters – Not Just to Americans
Need for Change to Protect Children in Armed Conflict
by Gordon Brown and Shaheed Fatima Q.C.
Filed under:
About the Author(s)
Jean Galbraith
Professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she focuses on U.S. foreign relations law and public international law, former Law Clerk for Judge Tatel at the D.C. Circuit and for Justice Stevens at the U.S. Supreme Court, former Associate Legal Officer for Judge Meron at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
Read these related stories next:
A Topical Index of COVID-19 Articles on Just Security
July 10, 2020 by Just Security
Under Cover of COVID at the UN: Why Counterterrorism Is Not the Answer to a Pandemic
July 10, 2020 by Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
National Security at the United Nations This Week (July 3-10)
July 10, 2020 by Kamran King
Colombian Peace Efforts on Life Support Amid the COVID-19 Response
July 9, 2020 by Nelson Camilo Sánchez
Forced Family Separation During COVID-19: Preventing Torture and Inhumane Treatment in Crisis
July 8, 2020 by Juan E. Méndez and Kathryn Hampton
The Odd Couple at the Center of the U.N.’s Counterterrorism Growth
July 8, 2020 by Eric Rosand and Alistair Millar
Mexico’s Priorities as an Elected Member to the Security Council for 2021-2022
July 7, 2020 by Pablo Arrocha Olabuenaga and Ambassador H.E. Juan Ramón de la Fuente
The Demise of Government: The Grim Task of Undoing Trump’s Damage
July 1, 2020 by Samuel Issacharoff and Adam Littlestone-Luria
National Security at the United Nations This Week (June 19-26)
June 26, 2020 by Kamran King
The ICC Wants Justice But Has No Mandate
June 24, 2020 by Brian L. Cox
COVID-19 in Mexico: Democracy is Not at Risk?
June 22, 2020 by Daniel Vázque